• I Nyoman Pasek Darmawan Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Vindi Kaldina Universitas Bangka Belitung
Keywords: Gap Strategy, Passivization, Relativization


On the basis of a detailed study of the applicative phenomenon in the Belitong language done by Darmawan and Kaldina (2022), this paper suggests its symmetrical treatment specifically in terms of NP’s relativization strategies. Through the descriptive-qualitative research method, this paper identifies and describes the most accessible relativization strategies in Belitong as derived from applicative constructions. The data were collected through elicitation, unstructured open-ended interviews, and document analysis of previous literature works on the Belitong language. The data analysis process proceeded by employing qualitative data techniques and a careful linguistic typological approach, RG. The results of this study showed that: (1) A gap strategy is employed in direct relativization, and it accommodates the revaluation of core arguments (S and O), (2) indirect relativization allows the application of the passivization strategy on object properties of applicative constructions. Interestingly, two types of passives are permissible to account for indirect relativization. In type 1, the advancement of an O as the head of RC causes the demotion of the initial S to chômeur, morphologically marked by the prefix de- preceding the verb. However, in the passive type 2, the base subject does not reside in chômeur, yet it becomes the subject of the main clause with no prefix appearing on the verb


Download data is not yet available.


[1] Arifin, S. S., Abubakar, T., & Alwi, Z. (2002). Sistem Reduplikasi Bahasa Melayu Belitung. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
[2] Blake, B. J. (2004). Case. (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Blake, B. J. (2005). Relational Grammar. London: Routledge.
[4] Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. (2nd ed). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[5] Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. (3rd ed). USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[6] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (4th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
[7] Darmawan, I. N. P. & Kaldina, V. (2022). Applicative Constructions in Belitong Language: A Morphosyntactic Study. Ethical Lingua Journal, 9(1), 1 – 13. doi: 10.30605/25409190.368.
[8] Darmawan, I. N. P. (2020). Applicative and Causative Constructions in Belitong Language: A Morphosyntactic Study [Thesis]. Universitas Mataram.
[9] Dixon, R. M. W. (2012). Basic Linguistic Theory: Volume 3 Further Grammatical Topics. United States: Oxford University Press Inc.
[10] Farrel, P. (2005). Grammatical Relations. The United States: Oxford University Press Inc.
[11] Fischer, O. (2007). Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. The United States: Oxford University Press Inc.
[12] Hanafi, N., Udin, Djuhaeni, E., & Syahrial, E. (2020). Relativization Strategies of Sasak Ngeno Ngene Dialect in Lombok. Ethical Lingua Journal, 7(1), 11 – 21. doi: 10.30605/25409190.162.
[13] Kemenade, A. V. (1999). Functional categories, morphosyntactic change, grammaticalization. Linguistics, 37(6), 997 – 1010.
[14] Kim, J. B. & Michaelis, L. A. (2020). Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[15] Kim, J. B. & Sells, P. (2008). English Syntax: An Introduction. (2nd ed). California: CSLI Publications.
[16] Napsin, S., Usman, M. Y., Zein, R. M. S., Tarmizi, Sudarmo, & Silahiddin, S. (1986). Morfologi dan Sintaksis Bahasa Melayu Belitung. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
[17] Panikar, D. (2020, October 14). Relativization in Subordination. Relativization in Subordination | δάσκαλος (
[18] Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Peterson, D. A. (2007). Applicative Constructions. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
[20] Phoocharoensil, S. and Simargool, N. (2010). English Relativization and Learners’ Problems. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 109 – 129.
[21] Putra, A. (2014, September 4). Sejarah Suku Belitung di Sumatera.
[22] Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Shibatani, M. (2008). Relativization in Sasak and Sumbawa, Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(4),865 – 916.
[24] Sneddon, J. N., Adelaar, A., Djenar, D. N., & Ewing, M. C. (2010). Indonesian Reference Grammar. (2nd ed). Australia: Allen & Unwin.
[25] Wal, J. V. D. (2017). Flexibility in symmetry: An Implicational relation in Bantu double object constructions. In Michelle Sheehan & laura R. Bailey (eds.), Order and structure in syntax II: Subjecthood and argument structure, 115-152. Berlin: Language Science Press.
How to Cite
Darmawan, I. N., & Kaldina, V. (2023). RELATIVIZATION STRATEGIES OF APPLICATIVE ARGUMENTS RELATION IN BELITONG. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), 193-210.