EXAMINING POWERS THROUGH SURYANI’S REPRESENTATION AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN WREGAS BHANUTEJA’S PHOTOCOPIER

  • Sonny Angjaya Universitas Kristen Maranatha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7454-499X
  • Hianly Muljadi Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Indonesia
  • Joanna Deborah Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Indonesia
Keywords: Film, Women, Representation, Sexual Violence, Feminism

Abstract

This study examines the representation of woman against sexual violence in Photocopier, an Indonesian film directed by Wregas Bhanuteja. In film, women as sexual violence victims are often misrepresented through stereotyping as the helpless victims who need men’s help to deal with the situation or showing extreme violence against their perpetrators to exact revenge. If not stereotyped, women as sexual violence victims also tend to be fetishized as their victimized body often sexualized for erotic pleasures. In its protagonist, Sur, Photocopier took different approach by representing the victim as a woman with powers to fight against the sexual violence she experienced. This study focuses in examining how Sur exerts her powers and how those powers impacted the sexual violence case that she experienced. The study is conducted qualitatively using content analysis method which examines the visual aspects as well as dialogues from the film and applying Amy Allen’s theory of feminist power relation. The analysis identifies that Suryani possesses and exercises all three types of feminist power posed by Allen, which are “power-to,” “power-over,” and “power-with,” as a sexual violence victim. The study reveals that while the film tries to represent Sur as a powerful woman, she is also adjacently represented as a stereotypical powerless sexual violence victim who is helpless to fight against her perpetrators even after exercising all her powers both personally and collectively. However, such stereotypical representation may be necessary to show the reality of sexual violence victims and as a form of criticism against the mishandling of sexual violence case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking Power. Hypatia, 13(1), 21–40. doi:10.1111/j.1527-
2001.1998.tb01350.x
Angjaya, S. (2021, June 28). The power of Bu Tejo and Dian? The analysis of feminist power
relation in the film Tilik. Capture: Jurnal Seni Media Rekam, 12(2), 132-159.
https://jurnal.isi- ska.ac.id/index.php/capture/article/view/3613/2852
Armstrong, C. L., & Mahone, J. (2017). “It’s on us.” The role of social media and rape culture in
individual willingness to mobilize against sexual assault. Mass Communication and
Society, 20(1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1185127
Bhanuteja, W. (Director). (2021). Photocopier. Kaninga Pictures.
Cuklanz, L. (2020). Media Representation of Rape and Sexual Assault. The International
Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc233
Dartnall, E., & Jewkes, R. (2013). Sexual violence against women: The scope of the problem. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 27(1), 3–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.002
Eigenberg, H., & Garland, R. (2008). Victim blaming. In L. J. Moriarty (Ed.), Controversies in
Victimology (pp. 21–36). Elsevier Press.
Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Pauley, P., Hanzal, A., & Triplett, L. (2006). Love, suspense, sex, and
violence: Men’s and women’s film predilections, exposure to sexually violent media, and
their relationship to rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 55, 311-320.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9085-0
Fikri, F. N., Zafirah, K. S., Istikomah, R. S., Zahra, S., & Hasibuan, H. A. (2022). Penyalin Cahaya: Analisis jenis pelecehan seksual pada film. Cinematology, 2(2), 32-47. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/Cinematology/article/download/45668/19200
George, N., & Kent, L. (2017). Sexual violence and hybrid peacebuilding: how does silence
‘speak’? Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(4), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2017.1395710
Gökulu, G. (2013). Representation of sexual violence in Turkish cinema and television series.
Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(2), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2013.11666149
Gravelin, C. R., Biernat, M., & Baldwin, M. (2019). The impact of power and powerlessness on
blaming the victim of sexual assault. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 98- 115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217706741
Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the other. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying
practices, 7.
Hayes-Smith, R., & Levett, L. M. (2010). Student perceptions of sexual assault resources and
prevalence of rape myth attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 5, 335–354. doi:10.1177/1557085110387581
Hogan, J. (2022). Anatomy of a rape: Sexual violence and secondary victimization scripts in US
film and television, 1959–2019. Crime, Media, Culture, 18(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211000388
Longhurst, B. J., Smith, G. W. H., Bagnall, G., Crawford, G., Ogborn, M., Baldwin, E., &
McCracken, S. (2008). Introducing cultural studies. Pearson.
Manohar, U., & Kline, S. L. (2014). Sexual Assault Portrayals in Hindi Cinema. Sex Roles, 71(5–
8), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0404-6
Penyalin Cahaya, film terbaik Piala Citra FFI 2021. (2021, November 10). CNN Indonesia.
Retrieved January 30, 2023, from
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/hiburan/20211110215900-220- 719441/penyalin-cahaya- film-terbaik-piala-citra-ffi-2021
Pratama, Y., Chitra, B. P., & Ilmi, D. (2024). Gender Injustice in Photocopier Movie by Wregas
Bhanuteja. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(2), 1-5.
Prysthon, A. (2016). Stuart Hall, film studies and the cinema. MATRIZes, 10(3), 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.11.606/issn.1982-8160.v10.i3p.77-88
Rahayu, N., Ekatjahjana, W., Isra, S., & Harianto, A. (2017). Legal Policy of Sexual Violence in
Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 67(2002), 174–184. www.iiste.org
Roberts, N., Donovan, C., & Durey, M. (2019). Agency, resistance and the non-‘ideal’ victim:
How women deal with sexual violence. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 3(3), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868019X15633766459801
Sari, A. P. (2023). Conflicting Opinions and Emotions in Students’ Responses to Feminist Resistance in the Film Photocopier. Ijlecr - International Journal of Language Education
and Culture Review, 9(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i2.39760
Serin, H. (2018). Non‐abusing mothers’ support needs after child sexual abuse disclosure: A
narrative review. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 539-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12455
Smith, J. A. (2017). Textual analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research
Methods, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0248
Smelik, A. (2016). Feminist film theory. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and
sexuality studies, 1-5.
Sutandio, A. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Kajian Sinema. Penerbit Ombak.
Tuhepaly, N. A. D., & Mazaid, S. A. (2022). Analisis Semiotika John Fiske Mengenai Representasi Pelecehan Seksual Pada Film Penyalin Cahaya. Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi,
5(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v5i2.1963
Wardaningsih, A. D., & Kasih, E. N. E. W. (2022). Delineation of Women Identity in the Disney
Animated Film Encanto (2019). Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 6(2),
209-229. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v6i2.160
Published
2024-08-19
How to Cite
Angjaya, S., Muljadi, H., & Deborah, J. (2024). EXAMINING POWERS THROUGH SURYANI’S REPRESENTATION AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN WREGAS BHANUTEJA’S PHOTOCOPIER. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v8i2.297