WELL, WELL, WELL: VARIATION IN DRESS VOWEL REALISATIONS BEFORE LATERAL /L/ IN AUSTRALIAN ENGLISH
Abstract
The ongoing el-æl merger in Australian English has been informally recognized by Australians especially those who have experience of contact with Victorians. This study aims to investigate the correlation of speakers’ sex and origin with their /el/ production and how speech styles influence their production. Two male speakers of Australian English from Victoria and South Australia were recorded while reading texts, doing interviews, and having casual conversations. The recordings were then transcribed and analyzed by using various software to describe their /el/ productions. The result of this study was both male subjects are able to produce considerable variations in their /el/ productions. The production of the Victorian male speaker confirmed the findings of previous studies while the SA male speaker showed variations of /el/ similar to back vowels. Speech styles do not significantly affect the variations of /el/ production. The ongoing merger of el-æl in Australian English might be spreading from Victoria through diffusion to its neighboring states. However, more studies should be conducted in order to confirm this suspicion. Other suggestions include customized reading passages and better semi-structured interviews.
Downloads
References
AudacityTeam. (2017). Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer application] (2.2.1). 2.2.1. Retrieved from https://audacityteam.org/
Baranowski, M., & Turton, D. (2015). Manchester English. In R. Hikcey (Ed.), Researching Northern English (pp. 283–305). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (6.0.37). 6.0.37. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
Clark, L., & Watson, K. (2016). Phonological leveling, diffusion, and divergence:/t/lenition in Liverpool and its hinterland. Language Variation and Change, 28(1), 31–62.
Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2004). The border effect: Vowel differences across the NSW-Victorian border. In C. Marovsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 1–27).
Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2007). Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37(3), 341–350.
Davison, G., Hirst, J., & Macintyre, S. (2001). The Oxford Companion to Australian History. Oxford University Press.
Di Paolo, M., Yaeger-Dror, M., & Wassink, A. B. (2011). Analyzing vowels. In M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A student’s guide (pp. 87–106). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Gordon, E., & Maclagan, M. (2001). “Capturing a Sound Change”: A Real Time Study Over 15 Years of the NEAR/SQUARE Diphthong Merger in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 215–238.
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–484.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language, 81(2), 344–387.
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 841–849.
Loakes, D., Hajek, J., & Fletcher, J. (2017). Can you t [æ] ll I’m from M [æ] lbourne? English World-Wide, 38(1), 29–49.
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 606–608.
Copyright (c) 2020 Ounu Zakiy Sukaton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
